As we stand on the brink of a technological revolution, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into policing presents both exciting possibilities and significant challenges. AI has the potential to transform various aspects of policing, from enhancing data analysis to streamlining administrative tasks. However, it is crucial to recognize that AI can never replace the invaluable role of police officers and their interactions with community members. During this time of staffing challenges, elected officials must understand that AI is only a tool to assist—not replace—police officers. The responsibility to properly fund law enforcement will not be negated by AI or any other tool.
One potential application of AI in policing is its ability to assist in report writing. AI-powered tools are being explored and tested to see if they can save time by automating routine documentation, which may allow officers to devote more time to community engagement and proactive policing. Despite these potential benefits, it is essential to maintain a human element in the review of AI-generated content. Officers must ensure the accuracy and context of reports, as AI lacks the nuanced understanding that human judgment provides.
AI can never replace the invaluable role of police officers and their interactions with community members.
Recent studies highlight the need for further investigation into AI’s role in policing. For example, a study from October 2024 found that current AI-enabled report-writing software did not improve the time it takes officers to complete their reports.1 Other emerging research suggests that AI can be leveraged in the analysis of body-worn camera footage.2 This could represent an opportunity to improve police professionalism when the technology is used in conjunction with human oversight. These findings are novel, and more research is needed to fully understand the impact of AI on policing activities.
The journey toward integrating AI into policing is still in its early stages. Extensive research and development are necessary to fully understand the implications and capabilities of AI technologies. Strong policies must be established to define the appropriate use of AI, ensuring that it serves as a supportive tool rather than a replacement for human officers.
To address these challenges and opportunities, the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) is assembling an AI working group. This group will convene at the IACP’s Policy Council Midyear Meeting in Grapevine, Texas. Led by members of the IACP Technology Policy Council, the working group will include members from across the policy councils and focus on developing guidelines and best practices for the use of AI in policing.
I am optimistic about the work of this group and the outcomes that will emerge. Their efforts will drive the thoughtful integration of AI into policing, taking into account ethics, community sentiment, and the value it brings to agencies and officers. By embracing AI responsibly, we can enhance our capabilities while preserving the essential human touch that defines effective policing.
As we move forward, it is imperative that we balance innovation with caution. AI offers tremendous potential, but its implementation must be guided by principles that prioritize the welfare of our communities and the integrity of our profession. Together, we can navigate this technological frontier and ensure that AI serves as a valuable ally in our mission to protect and serve.d
Notes:
1Ian T. Adams et al., “No Man’s Hand: Artificial Intelligence Does Not Improve Police Report Writing Speed,” Journal of Experimental Criminology (2024).
2Rose Cisneros, “Policing in the Age of AI: Criminology Research Gives Glimpse into the Future of Law Enforcement,” news release, University of South Carolina, October 23, 2024.
Please cite as:
Ken A. Walker, “Embracing AI in Policing,” President’s Message, Police Chief 92, no. 4 (April 2025): 6–7.
